linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] sched/core: uclamp: enforce last task UCLAMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpG7vmOJZOuZBqy7G3b-ovXeLmPVB9pBaj=XKviOZ7PWzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:40:08 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] sched/core: uclamp: enforce last task UCLAMP_MAX

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Patrick Bellasi
<patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
> On 20-Jul 18:23, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>
> Hi Sure,
> thank!
>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Patrick Bellasi
>> <patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> > @@ -977,13 +991,21 @@ static inline void uclamp_cpu_get_id(struct task_struct *p,
>> >         uc_grp = &rq->uclamp.group[clamp_id][0];
>> >         uc_grp[group_id].tasks += 1;
>> >
>> > +       /* Force clamp update on idle exit */
>> > +       uc_cpu = &rq->uclamp;
>> > +       clamp_value = p->uclamp[clamp_id].value;
>> > +       if (unlikely(uc_cpu->flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)) {
>>
>> The condition below is not needed because UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE is set only
>> for UCLAMP_MAX clamp_id, therefore the above condition already covers
>> the one below.
>
> Not really, this function is called two times, the first time to
> update UCLAMP_MIN and a second time to update UCLAMP_MAX.
>
> For both clamp_id we want to force update uc_cpu->value[clamp_id],
> thus the UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE flag has to be cleared only the second time.
>
> Maybe I can had the following comment to better explain the reason of
> the check:
>
>                 /*
>                  * This function is called for both UCLAMP_MIN (before) and
>                  * UCLAMP_MAX (after). Let's reset the flag only the when
>                  * we know that UCLAMP_MIN has been already updated.
>                  */
>

Ah, my bad. I missed the fact that uc_cpu->flags is shared for both
UCLAMP_MIN and UCLAMP_MAX. It's fine the way it originally was. Thanks
for explanation!

>> > +               if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX)
>> > +                       uc_cpu->flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
>> > +               uc_cpu->value[clamp_id] = clamp_value;
>> > +               return;
>> > +       }
>
> [...]
>
> --
> #include <best/regards.h>
>
> Patrick Bellasi