[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180724094251.GA32366@linux-zmni.apac.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:42:51 +0800
From: Sean Fu <fxinrong@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/buffer.c: Optimize grow_buffer function.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 01:30:17AM +0800, Sean Fu wrote:
> > Use PAGE_SHIFT and i_blkbits of bd_inode directly to avoid ugly sizebits
> > calculation.
> > Remove ugly sizebits calculation.
> > Remove unnecessary sizebits parameter of grow_dev_page.
> >
> > Reduces code size:
> >
> > Before:
> >
> > sean@...ux-zmni:~/sda5/source/linus_repo/linux> size fs/buffer.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 34037 1510 16 35563 8aeb fs/buffer.o
> >
> > After:
> >
> > sean@...ux-zmni:~/sda5/source/linus_repo/linux> size fs/buffer.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 34021 1510 16 35547 8adb fs/buffer.o
>
> First of all, 16 bytes is pretty much noise. What's more, the "remove ugly
> sizebits calculation" part really needs an explanation of the reasons why
> it's safe. You assume that size == 1<<bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits; where's
> the proof that it always holds?
Thank your for taking a look and apologize for the noise.
I will take a deep look at it and especially history commits regarding with this.
BestRegards
Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists