[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfad19eec11f7f3affc51f1ecc41d3f6eaa65e7c.camel@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:34:48 +0000
From: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To: "andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
CC: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Revert "ARM: dts: imx7d: Invert legacy PCI irq
mapping"
On Mon, 2018-07-23 at 11:38 -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:41 AM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 08:33 -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 5:48 AM Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit 1c86c9dd82f859b474474a7fee0d5195da2c9c1d.
> > > >
> > > > That commit followed the reference manual but unfortunately the imx7d
> > > > manual is incorrect.
> > >
> > > I'd also add similar comment to DT file to prevent people from trying
> > > to "fix" this in the future.
> >
> > I'll try to see if I can follow up internally with docs team to get
> > this updated in the next revision of the reference manual.
>
> Not sure if we are on the same page here, but what I meant is adding
> the same explanation that is in your commit message to Device Tree
> file as well so that if anyone looks at DT code and goes "Huh?" in the
> future, they wouldn't have to research commit history to see the
> reason why things the way they are.
OK, I will add a comment on irq mappings in the next version explaining
that the reference manual is incorrect.
> > > Also, this change is going to break QEMU's mapping found here:
> >
> > I had no idea that existed, I guess somebody needs to fix that as well.
>
> I take it it's a no to my "any chance you can fix that as well?" ;-).
> I'll see if I can find time to do that this week.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with qemu source at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists