[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180724114334.GA21973@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:43:34 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sh: split arch/sh/mm/consistent.c
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:49:39AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > + *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret);
> > > + if (!WARN_ON(!dev))
> > > + *dma_handle - PFN_PHYS(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
> > vs
> > > - *dma_handle = virt_to_phys(ret);
> > > - if (!WARN_ON(!dev))
> > > - *dma_handle -= PFN_PHYS(dev->dma_pfn_offset);
>
> Doesn't look right to me, neither.
>
> No complaints for 0day? My gcc says:
>
> error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
For some reason 0day has failed me multiple times for sh. Does the
0day bot even cover sh at all?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists