[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180724134048.GA30682@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:40:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
glider@...gle.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
parri.andrea@...il.com, peter@...leysoftware.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, will.deacon@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/12] atomic/tty: Fix up atomic abuse in ldsem
* Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> > Ok, then these bits will have to wait until Greg's tree goes upstream
> > in about two weeks.
>
> Ok.
>
> > Which patches can I apply as a preparatory step?
>
> Patches 2-6 can be applied now.
Ok, will apply those.
> I guess I should rebase and resend the remaining bits once Greg's tree
> goes upstream?
Yeah, easiest would be to do that once Greg's and tip:locking/core changes (with
patches 2-6) both got merged by Linus.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists