linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WHJcAoR7Y_uhi7_GbVzy6K8FnovVFVRz8js0REONox=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:43:46 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc:     David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] regulator: dt-bindings: add QCOM RPMh regulator bindings

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:11:30AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> RPMh itself landed in Andy's tree and he sent a pull request on
>> Saturday.  Feel free to refer to the request ("[GIT PULL] Qualcomm
>> Driver updates for 4.19") AKA
>> <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10539125/>.
>
>> It doesn't look like arm-soc has picked up Andy's pull request yet
>> though.  If having it in arm-soc is a requirement then I'm happy to
>> monitor arm-soc and ping this thread again when it's there.
>
> There was also some other thing called command DB as well which was a
> separate series.  Ideally there'd be a branch I could pull as there's a
> build dependency on rpmh so I can't apply until the code has landed in
> my tree, don't know what command DB is exactly.

Yup.  That one landed in May and is already in mainline Linux.  Refer
to commit 312416d9171a ("drivers: qcom: add command DB driver").

Adding Andy to this thread (I guess he wasn't on it?).  Hopefully he
can provide you with the branch.

-Doug