linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] sched/core: uclamp: use percentage clamp values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHddNKXNVBs21sCADcHjW7zxxue8jg1B4KbPh-QLNe46g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:11:54 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] sched/core: uclamp: use percentage clamp values

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Patrick Bellasi
<patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
> On 21-Jul 21:04, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Patrick Bellasi
>> <patrick.bellasi@....com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> > +static inline unsigned int scale_from_percent(unsigned int pct)
>> > +{
>> > +       WARN_ON(pct > 100);
>> > +
>> > +       return ((SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SCALE * pct) / 100);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static inline unsigned int scale_to_percent(unsigned int value)
>> > +{
>> > +       unsigned int rounding = 0;
>> > +
>> > +       WARN_ON(value > SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SCALE);
>> > +
>> > +       /* Compensate rounding errors for: 0, 256, 512, 768, 1024 */
>> > +       if (likely((value & 0xFF) && ~(value & 0x700)))
>> > +               rounding = 1;
>>
>> Hmm. I don't think ~(value & 0x700) will ever yield FALSE... What am I missing?
>
> So, 0x700 is the topmost 3 bits sets (111 0000 0000) which different
> configuration corresponds to:
>
>  001 0000 0000 =>  256
>  010 0000 0000 =>  512
>  011 0000 0000 =>  768
>  100 0000 0000 => 1024
>
> Thus, if 0x700 matches then we have one of these values in input and
> for these cases we have to add a unit to the percentage value.
>
> For the case (value == 0) we translate it into 0% thanks to the check
> on (value & 0xFF) to ensure rounding = 0.
>

I think just (value & 0xFF) is enough to get you the right behavior.
~(value & 0x700) is not needed, it's effectively a NoOp which always
yields TRUE. For any *value* (value & 0x700) == 0x...00 and ~(value &
0x700) == 0x...FF == TRUE.

> Here is a small python snippet I've used to check the conversion of
> all the possible percentage values:
>
> ---8<---
> values = range(0, 101)
> for pct in xrange(0, 101):
>         util = int((1024 * pct) / 100)
>         rounding = 1
>         if not ((util & 0xFF) and ~(util & 0x700)):
>             print "Fixing util_to_perc({:3d} => {:4d})".format(pct, util)
>             rounding = 0
>         pct2 = (rounding + ((100 * util) / 1024))
>         if pct2 in values:
>                 values.remove(pct2)
>         if pct != pct2:
>             print "Convertion failed for: {:3d} => {:4d} => {:3d}".format(pct, util, pct2)
> if values:
>     print "ERROR: not all percentage values converted"
> ---8<---
>
> --
> #include <best/regards.h>
>
> Patrick Bellasi