[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180724171428.GQ13268@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:14:28 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Agrawal, Akshu" <Akshu.Agrawal@....com>
Cc: djkurtz@...omium.org, Alexander.Deucher@....com,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@...omium.org>,
"Mukunda, Vijendar" <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: AMD: Add a fix voltage regulator for DA7219 and
ADAU7002
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:56:44AM +0530, Agrawal, Akshu wrote:
> This approach shows inconsistencies and in some boot cycles da7219 fails
> to get regulator. Form the logs (below) it shows time gap between the
> time we call “platform_device_register(&acp_da7219_regulator);” and when
> the regulator actually gets registered.
This hack isn't going to help with that AFAICT, you're still registering
a platform device and relying on it appearing in time? It just
registers less often. I think what we need here is a way to register
the link between the devices independently of the regulator registering
or firmware, that way we won't get a dummy regulator. Since AFAICT we
know the names of the devices that are being registered we can use their
dev_name()s which seems tractable - we need a function in
regulator/machine.h which lets you provide a set of struct
regulator_consumer_supply for a target dev_name.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists