linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add SPDX license identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180724200312.xs6u4nvhjckukkig@kozik-lap>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:03:12 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:     Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add SPDX license
 identifier

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:02:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Replace GPL license statement with SPDX license identifier (GPL-2.0+).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h | 12 +-----------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h
> > index 0646500bca69..642e4e7f4084 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h
> > @@ -1,19 +1,9 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> 
> This code should be GPL-2.0 only, original license statement is most
> likely result of using wrong file as the source of copy-paste. So I
> would like to have the license fixed first before doing conversion to
> SPDX.

If you think that's the case, then it makes sense and please go ahead.
As fair as I remember this required signed-off from all contributors...
so probably just Lukasz and Eduardo?

Best regards,
Krzysztof