[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56751e17-a271-1a73-026b-838e6b739420@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:22:54 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM/MMU: Combine flushing remote tlb in mmu_set_spte()
On 07/24/2018 10:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/07/2018 10:17, Tianyu Lan wrote:
>> mmu_set_spte() flushes remote tlbs for drop_parent_pte/drop_spte()
>> and set_spte() separately. This may introduce redundant flush. This
>> patch is to combine these flushes and check flush request after
>> calling set_spte().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>
> Looks good, but I'd like a second opinion. Guangrong, Junaid, can you
> review this?
>
It looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
BTW, the @intel box is not accessible to me now. ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists