[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod7Fqj_pJ2sn+XiDsoDX4jBLM22iGUrB9PeJXg+8S5xExQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:27:50 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: bmerry@....ac.za
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: reduce memcg tree traversals for stats collection
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:26 AM Bruce Merry <bmerry@....ac.za> wrote:
>
> On 25 July 2018 at 00:46, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> wrote:
> > I ran a simple benchmark which reads the root_mem_cgroup's stat file
> > 1000 times in the presense of 2500 memcgs on cgroup-v1. The results are:
> >
> > Without the patch:
> > $ time ./read-root-stat-1000-times
> >
> > real 0m1.663s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m1.660s
> >
> > With the patch:
> > $ time ./read-root-stat-1000-times
> >
> > real 0m0.468s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.467s
>
> Thanks for cc'ing me. I've tried this patch using my test case and the
> results are interesting. With the patch applied, running my script
> only generates about 8000 new cgroups, compared to 40,000 before -
> presumably because the optimisation has altered the timing.
>
> On the other hand, if I run the script 5 times to generate 40000
> zombie cgroups, the time to get stats for the root cgroup (cgroup-v1)
> is almost unchanged at around 18ms (was 20ms, but there were slightly
> more cgroups as well), compared to the almost 4x speedup you're seeing
> in your test.
>
Hi Bruce, I think your script is trying to create zombies, so, the
experiments after that script will be non-deterministic. Why not just
create 40k cgroups ,no need for zombies, and the see how much this
patch affects reading stats.
Shakeel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists