[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1962880.1xTuyOsKT9@agathebauer>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:23:18 +0200
From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf script: Show correct offsets for DWARF-based
unwinding
On Montag, 9. Juli 2018 16:25:07 CEST Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 05:35:55PM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > After:
> > # perf report --stdio --no-children -s sym,srcline -g address
> >
> > # Samples: 1 of event 'probe_libc:inet_pton'
> > # Event count (approx.): 1
> > #
> > # Overhead Symbol Source:Line
> > # ........ .................... ...........
> > #
> >
> > 100.00% [.] __GI___inet_pton inet_pton.c
> >
> > ---gaih_inet.constprop.7 getaddrinfo.c:537
> >
> > getaddrinfo getaddrinfo.c:2304
> > main ping.c:519
> > generic_start_main.isra.0 libc-start.c:308
> > __libc_start_main libc-start.c:102
> >
> > ...
> >
> > # perf script -F comm,ip,sym,symoff,srcline,dso
> >
> > ping
> >
> > 7fffb38aaf28 __GI___inet_pton+0x8 (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> >
> > inet_pton.c:68
> >
> > 7fffb385fa53 gaih_inet.constprop.7+0xf43
> > (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> >
> > getaddrinfo.c:537
> >
> > 7fffb38605b3 getaddrinfo+0x163 (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> >
> > getaddrinfo.c:2304
> >
> > 130782d6f main+0x3df (/usr/bin/ping)
> >
> > ping.c:519
> >
> > 7fffb377369f generic_start_main.isra.0+0x13f
> > (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> >
> > libc-start.c:308
> >
> > 7fffb3773897 __libc_start_main+0xb7
> > (/usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> >
> > libc-start.c:102
> >
> > Fixes: 67540759151a ("perf unwind: Use addr_location::addr instead of ip
> > for entries") Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> looks good to me, Milian?
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation.
The above looks somewhat strange to me - why is there no `(inlined)` suffix
visible anymore?
Also, I can't test this patch locally, since - even without this patch -
inline frame resolution with perf seems to be completely broken for me. It
doesn't seem to be a perf regression - going back in time doesn't resole this
- but rather of its dependencies or even of the DWARF emitted by the compilers
I have available to test...
Cheers
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@...b.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (3826 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists