linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] fs/epoll: simply CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:30:46 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     jbaron@...mai.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] fs/epoll: simply CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL ifdefery

On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:06:33 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:

> >> +#else
> >> +#define ep_busy_loop(ep, nonblock)		do { } while (0)
> >> +#define ep_reset_busy_poll_napi_id(ep)		do { } while (0)
> >> +#define ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(epi)		do { } while (0)
> >> +
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
> >
> >inlines are preferred.  Because macros are fugly and can cause
> >unused-var warnings when the stub versions are used.
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> >This?
> 
> Do you want me to send a v2 or will you fold in the below?

I queued both patches.