| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ca37de93-4079-4270-aa91-8411a07b168f@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:09:04 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@...adcom.com>,
Vikram Prakash <vikram.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sp805: Add clock-frequency property
On 07/25/2018 09:47 PM, Srinath Mannam wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> It was my mistake sorry for that. I thought to add as Rivewed-by your name..
> Many changes are made based on your review comments and suggestions.
> So, Can I add your name in Reviewed list?
You did that already below, and I am ok with that.
Guenter
> I will modify and send next patchset.
>
> thank you.
>
> Regards,
> Srinath.
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 07/23/2018 01:37 AM, Srinath Mannam wrote:
>>>
>>> Use clock-frequency property given in _DSD object
>>> of ACPI device to calculate Watchdog rate as binding
>>> clock devices are not available as device tree.
>>>
>>> Note: There is no formal review process for _DSD
>>> properties
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>>
>> I just noticed this. This is completely inappropriate. It is
>> the equivalent of forging a signature on a check.
>>
>> _Never_ add a Signed-off-by: statement for anyone but yourself.
>>
>> Guenter
>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>>> index 9849db0..a896b1c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sp805_wdt.c
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>> * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
>>> */
>>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>> #include <linux/device.h>
>>> #include <linux/resource.h>
>>> #include <linux/amba/bus.h>
>>> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/math64.h>
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> #include <linux/pm.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>> @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ struct sp805_wdt {
>>> spinlock_t lock;
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> struct clk *clk;
>>> + u64 rate;
>>> struct amba_device *adev;
>>> unsigned int load_val;
>>> };
>>> @@ -80,7 +83,7 @@ static int wdt_setload(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>>> unsigned int timeout)
>>> struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>>> u64 load, rate;
>>> - rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>>> + rate = wdt->rate;
>>> /*
>>> * sp805 runs counter with given value twice, after the end of
>>> first
>>> @@ -106,9 +109,7 @@ static int wdt_setload(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>>> unsigned int timeout)
>>> static unsigned int wdt_timeleft(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>>> {
>>> struct sp805_wdt *wdt = watchdog_get_drvdata(wdd);
>>> - u64 load, rate;
>>> -
>>> - rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>>> + u64 load;
>>> spin_lock(&wdt->lock);
>>> load = readl_relaxed(wdt->base + WDTVALUE);
>>> @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ static unsigned int wdt_timeleft(struct
>>> watchdog_device *wdd)
>>> load += wdt->load_val + 1;
>>> spin_unlock(&wdt->lock);
>>> - return div_u64(load, rate);
>>> + return div_u64(load, wdt->rate);
>>> }
>>> static int
>>> @@ -228,11 +229,25 @@ sp805_wdt_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const
>>> struct amba_id *id)
>>> if (IS_ERR(wdt->base))
>>> return PTR_ERR(wdt->base);
>>> - wdt->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>>> - if (IS_ERR(wdt->clk)) {
>>> - dev_warn(&adev->dev, "Clock not found\n");
>>> - ret = PTR_ERR(wdt->clk);
>>> - goto err;
>>> + if (adev->dev.of_node) {
>>> + wdt->clk = devm_clk_get(&adev->dev, NULL);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(wdt->clk)) {
>>> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Clock not found\n");
>>> + return PTR_ERR(wdt->clk);
>>> + }
>>> + wdt->rate = clk_get_rate(wdt->clk);
>>> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(&adev->dev)) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * When Driver probe with ACPI device, clock devices
>>> + * are not available, so watchdog rate get from
>>> + * clock-frequency property given in _DSD object.
>>> + */
>>> + device_property_read_u64(&adev->dev, "clock-frequency",
>>> + &wdt->rate);
>>> + if (!wdt->rate) {
>>> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "no clock-frequency
>>> property\n");
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> wdt->adev = adev;
>>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists