linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Fix check-headers.sh output file variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180726062239.GA24334@krava>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:22:39 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kapshuk@...il.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
        namhyung@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tools: Fix check-headers.sh output file
 variables

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:20:07AM +0100, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:

SNIP

> > > % file1=file1; file2=file2
> > > % cmd="echo diff $file1 $file2"
> > > % test -f $file2 &&
> > > eval $cmd || echo "Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/$file1'
> > > differs from latest version at '$file2'" >&2
> > > Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/file1' differs from latest
> > > version at 'file2'
> > >
> > > Is this something you would rather leave as is, or perhaps use something
> > > along the lines of the code below instead:
> > >
> > > test -f $file2 && {
> > > eval $cmd ||
> > > echo "Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/$file' differs from latest
> > > version at '$file'" >&2
> > > }
> >
> > hi,
> > yea, probably..  please feel free to post a patch.. just make sure all
> > the displayed files paths are based on the kernel root
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> 
> I'm away traveling till August 10th, and I may not be able to send the
> patch in until I get back. Is that OK?

sure, thanks

jirka