[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24724042.UC9DsrE2FJ@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:50:35 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
P HeLiOn <perryhelionsemail@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Avoid PM quirks on suspend and resume from S3
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:15:03 AM CEST Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>
> > On 2018Jul26, at 16:14, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:46 AM, Kai-Heng Feng
> > <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael,
> >>
> >>> On 2018Jul24, at 18:36, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 11:13:42 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:46:09 AM CEST Kai Heng Feng wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Rafael,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It is reported that commit a192aa923b66a (ACPI / LPSS: Consolidate
> >>>>>> runtime PM and system sleep handling) introduced a system suspend
> >>>>>> regression on some machines, but the only functional change made by
> >>>>>> it was to cause the PM quirks in the LPSS to also be used during
> >>>>>> system suspend and resume. While that should always work for
> >>>>>> suspend-to-idle, it turns out to be problematic for S3
> >>>>>> (suspend-to-RAM).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To address that issue restore the previous S3 suspend and resume
> >>>>>> behavior of the LPSS to avoid applying PM quirks then.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The users reported that this patch does fix the S3 issue, but the S4 still
> >>>>> fails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please refer to [1] for more for user's testing result.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1774950/comments/60
> >>>>
> >>>> Please ask the users to test the patch below, then, on top of the $subject one.
> >>>
> >>> There was a mistake in the previous patch I posted, sorry about that.
> >>>
> >>> Please test this one instead:
> >>
> >> The result is positive, thanks!
> >
> > Good, thanks!
> >
> > I assume that S3 still works with this patch applied too.
>
> Yes, S3 continues to work with this patch.
OK, thanks!
Let me resend the patch with a proper subject and changelog, then.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists