[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726151202.GE27305@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:12:02 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: bskeggs@...hat.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Set DRIVER_ATOMIC cap earlier to fix debugfs
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:13:20PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> commit eb493fbc150f4a28151ae1ee84f24395989f3600 upstream
>
> Currently nouveau doesn't actually expose the state debugfs file that's
> usually provided for any modesetting driver that supports atomic, even
> if nouveau is loaded with atomic=1. This is due to the fact that the
> standard debugfs files that DRM creates for atomic drivers is called
> when drm_get_pci_dev() is called from nouveau_drm.c. This happens well
> before we've initialized the display core, which is currently
> responsible for setting the DRIVER_ATOMIC cap.
>
> So, move the atomic option into nouveau_drm.c and just add the
> DRIVER_ATOMIC cap whenever it's enabled on the kernel commandline. This
> shouldn't cause any actual issues, as the atomic ioctl will still fail
> as expected even if the display core doesn't disable it until later in
> the init sequence. This also provides the added benefit of being able to
> use the state debugfs file to check the current display state even if
> clients aren't allowed to modify it through anything other than the
> legacy ioctls.
>
> Additionally, disable the DRIVER_ATOMIC cap in nv04's display core, as
> this was already disabled there previously.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 7 +++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 6 ------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Please give me a hint as to what kernel versions you want the patches to
be applied to, otherwise I just have to guess :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists