linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] sched/topology: Lowest energy aware balancing sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <76777be2-0f70-ca54-21a8-5af77a47ea86@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:00:50 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        chris.redpath@....com, patrick.bellasi@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...cinc.com, skannan@...cinc.com,
        pkondeti@...eaurora.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        edubezval@...il.com, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        currojerez@...eup.net, javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/14] sched/topology: Lowest energy aware balancing
 sched_domain level pointer

Hi,

On 24/07/18 13:25, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Add another member to the family of per-cpu sched_domain shortcut
> pointers. This one, sd_ea, points to the lowest level at which energy
> aware scheduling should be used.
> 
> Generally speaking, the largest opportunity to save energy via scheduling
> comes from a smarter exploitation of heterogeneous platforms (i.e.
> big.LITTLE). Consequently, the sd_ea shortcut is wired to the lowest
> scheduling domain at which the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag is set. For
> example, it is possible to apply Energy-Aware Scheduling within a socket
> on a multi-socket system, as long as each socket has an asymmetric
> topology. Cross-sockets wake-up balancing will only happen when the
> system is over-utilized, or this_cpu and prev_cpu are in different
> sockets.
> 
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    | 1 +
>  kernel/sched/topology.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index fdf6924d53e7..25d64a0b6fe0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1198,6 +1198,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
>  DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_asym);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_ea);

There's already the asym-packing shortcut which is making naming a bit more
tedious, but should that really be named energy-aware? IMO it's just the
lowest level at which we can see asymmetry, so perhaps it should be named
as such, i.e. something like sd_asym_capa (and perhaps rename the other one
as sd_asym_pack)?

>  
>  struct sched_group_capacity {
>  	atomic_t		ref;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index ade1eae9d21b..8f3f746b0d5e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_llc_id);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain_shared *, sd_llc_shared);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_numa);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_asym);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_ea);
>  
>  static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>  {
> @@ -539,6 +540,9 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
>  
>  	sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_ASYM_PACKING);
>  	rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_asym, cpu), sd);
> +
> +	sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY);
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_ea, cpu), sd);
>  }
>  
>  /*
>