linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: add crc64 calculation routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ad442c01-8fd7-12ac-3b8d-bfab738c7bde@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:28:45 +0800
From:   Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Lyle <mlyle@...e.org>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] lib: add crc64 calculation routines

On 2018/7/26 5:22 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:37:23 +0800 Coly Li <colyli@...e.de> wrote:
> 
>>> IIUC this series in Andrew's quilt. So, it's still possible to replace
>>> it with better one, I suppose. Ask Andrew (at least I remember recent
>>> case where he just replaced series by fixed one).
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> It seems there should be some fix/update for this series. I see current
>> series is in linux-next for now. If I want to add the fix, should I post
>> a new version of the series, or the incremental patches to fix current
>> series ?
> 
> mm...  it sounds like the changes will be large, so probably a new
> series would be better at this early stage.  If the changes are small
> then little fixup patches would be nicer to the people who have already
> reviewed v1.
> 

Yes, it is large (patch 3/3 will be removed). So I will post a new
series to replace current series.

Thanks for the hint.

Coly Li