lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a65a6023-a527-b9c6-0d78-a175d47f55cf@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:48:21 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree

On 7/26/18 1:48 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:56:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
>> index 86121a7a19b2..8c30ac7d8078 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
>> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ nvmet_rdma_find_get_device(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id)
>>  
>>  	inline_page_count = num_pages(port->inline_data_size);
>>  	inline_sge_count = max(cm_id->device->attrs.max_sge_rd,
>> -				cm_id->device->attrs.max_sge) - 1;
>> +				cm_id->device->attrs.max_send_sge) - 1;
> 
> This should be max_recv_sge.

Why do we even have this conflicts to begin with?


-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ