[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075012B084089@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:00:10 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: fix broken noncoherent cache ops
On 07/26/2018 02:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 05:13:02PM +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> All DMA devices on ARC haven't worked with SW cache control
>> since commit a8eb92d02dd7 ("arc: fix arc_dma_{map,unmap}_page")
>> This happens because we don't check direction argument at all in
>> new implementation. Fix that.
>>
>> Fixies: commit a8eb92d02dd7 ("arc: fix arc_dma_{map,unmap}_page")
>> Signed-off-by: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
> Looks sensible. Might be worth explaining that ARC can speculate
> into the areas under DMA, which is why this is required.
>
ARC CPUs do prefetch, but I doubt if they are doing so, so aggressively, specially
when the region around DMA buffers is unlikely to be used for normal LD/ST
bleeding into DMA buffers. The issue here seems to be less technical and a bit of
snafu in implementation details.
1. originally
dma_map_single(@dir) => honored @dir, and did inv, wback or both depending on it
sync_for_device(@dir) => forced @dir DMA_TO_DEV = > cache wback
sync_for_cpu(@dir) => forced @dir DMA_FROM_DEV = > cache inv
2. After commit a8eb92d02dd7, dma_map_single() starting callingsync_for_device( )
which as noted above didn't respect @dir, only doing cache wback, and thus would
fail for DMA_FROM_DEV/BIDIR cases where cpu needs to read from buffer and thus
requires cache inv as well. Likewise dma_unmap_single() would unconditionally do
cache inv, given usage of sync_for_cpu() which would be wrong for the TO_DEVICE cases.
Too bad I didn't spot this in the code review myself at the time.
-Vineet
Powered by blists - more mailing lists