linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/16] staging:rtl8192u: Rename HW90_BLOCK_E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 20:24:23 +0100
From:   John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/16] staging:rtl8192u: Rename HW90_BLOCK_E - Style

Rename the enumerated type HW90_BLOCK_E to hw90_block_e. Whilst this is
not flagged by checkpatch types are meant to be in lowercase.

This is a coding style change which should have no impact on runtime
code execution.

Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c | 8 ++++----
 drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.h | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
index 983520b3aa25..c8c54484eab5 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
@@ -687,14 +687,14 @@ static void rtl8192_InitBBRFRegDef(struct net_device *dev)
  * function:  This function is to write register and then readback to make
  *            sure whether BB and RF is OK
  * input:     net_device        *dev
- *            HW90_BLOCK_E      CheckBlock
+ *            hw90_block_e      CheckBlock
  *            RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath  //only used when checkblock is
  *                                       //HW90_BLOCK_RF
  * output:    none
  * return:    return whether BB and RF is ok (0:OK, 1:Fail)
  * notice:    This function may be removed in the ASIC
  ******************************************************************************/
-u8 rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(struct net_device *dev, enum HW90_BLOCK_E CheckBlock,
+u8 rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(struct net_device *dev, enum hw90_block_e CheckBlock,
 			    enum RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath)
 {
 	u8 ret = 0;
@@ -786,10 +786,10 @@ static void rtl8192_BB_Config_ParaFile(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	/* ----Ckeck FPGAPHY0 and PHY1 board is OK---- */
 	/* TODO: this function should be removed on ASIC */
-	for (eCheckItem = (enum HW90_BLOCK_E)HW90_BLOCK_PHY0;
+	for (eCheckItem = (enum hw90_block_e)HW90_BLOCK_PHY0;
 	     eCheckItem <= HW90_BLOCK_PHY1; eCheckItem++) {
 		/* don't care RF path */
-		status = rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(dev, (enum HW90_BLOCK_E)eCheckItem,
+		status = rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(dev, (enum hw90_block_e)eCheckItem,
 						  (enum RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)0);
 		if (status != 0) {
 			RT_TRACE((COMP_ERR | COMP_PHY),
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.h
index 2cd1c25164a2..d9503996457d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ struct sw_chnl_cmd {
 	u32		        ms_delay;
 } __packed;
 
-enum HW90_BLOCK_E {
+enum hw90_block_e {
 	HW90_BLOCK_MAC = 0,
 	HW90_BLOCK_PHY0 = 1,
 	HW90_BLOCK_PHY1 = 2,
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ u32 rtl8192_phy_QueryRFReg(struct net_device *dev,
 void rtl8192_phy_configmac(struct net_device *dev);
 void rtl8192_phyConfigBB(struct net_device *dev, u8 ConfigType);
 u8 rtl8192_phy_checkBBAndRF(struct net_device *dev,
-			    enum HW90_BLOCK_E CheckBlock,
+			    enum hw90_block_e CheckBlock,
 			    enum RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath);
 void rtl8192_BBConfig(struct net_device *dev);
 void rtl8192_phy_getTxPower(struct net_device *dev);
-- 
2.18.0