[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180726193203.GA12992@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:32:03 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+b8e0dfee3fd8c9012771@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/shmem.c:LINE!
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 09:40:20AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:53:15PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > and fixing the bug differently ;-) But many thanks for spotting it!
>
> I thought you might :)
The xas_* functions are all _expected_ to behave the same way when
passed an XA_STATE containing an error -- do nothing. xas_create_range()
behaved that way initially, then I fixed a bug and broke that invariant.
Now the test suite checks it so I won't break it again.
> > I'll look into the next bug you reported ...
>
> No need: that idea now works a lot better when I use the initialized
> "start", instead of the uninitialized "index".
Ugh. xas_create_range() is _supposed_ to return with xas pointing to
the first index in the range. I wonder what I messed up. I've had a
go at producing a test-case for this and haven't provoked a bug yet.
Still, I don't want to keep xas_create_range() around long-term.
I want to transition all the places that currently use it to use
multi-index entries. So I'm going to put your workaround in and then
work on deleting xas_create_range() altogether.
Thanks so much for all your work on this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists