linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 22:55:53 +0300
From:   "Fancer's opinion" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To:     Paul Burton <Paul.Burton@...s.com>
Cc:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

Hello, folks
Regarding the no_bootmem patchset I've sent earlier.
I'm terribly sorry about huge delay with response. I got sucked in a new
project, so just didn't have a time to proceed with the series, answer to
the questions and resend the set.
If it is still relevant and needed for community, I can get back to the
series on the next week, answer to the Mett's questions (sorry, man, for
doing it so long), rebase it on top of the kernel 4.18 and resend the new
version. We also can try to combine it with this patch, if it is found
convenient.

Regards,
-Sergey

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, 20:20 Paul Burton, <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:03:56AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Any comments on this?
>
> I haven't looked at this in detail yet, but there was a much larger
> series submitted to accomplish this not too long ago, which needed
> another revision:
>
>
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/project/linux-mips/list/?series=787&state=*
>
> Given that, I'd be (pleasantly) surprised if this one smaller patch is
> enough.
>
> Thanks,
>     Paul
>

Content of type "text/html" skipped