[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180726200730.18290-5-dianders@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:07:30 -0700
From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: balbi@...nel.org, hminas@...opsys.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: stefan.wahren@...e.com, grigor.tovmasyan@...opsys.com,
Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [REPOST PATCH 4/4] usb: dwc2: Turn on uframe_sched on "stm32f4x9_fsotg" platforms
There's no reason to have the uframe scheduler off on dwc2. Running
with uframe_sched = False is equivalent to saying "I don't want to run
the correct code, I want to run the old and incorrect code".
The uframe scheduler has been off on stm32f4x9_fsotg since commit
e35b135055e2 ("usb: dwc2: Add support for STM32F429/439/469 USB OTG
HS/FS in FS mode (internal PHY)"). That commit is pretty recent, so
it's unclear to me why the uframe scheduler was left off. Hopefully
it's because someone copied it from other parameters and didn't think
to try it?
Presumably if everyone is good w/ the uframe_sched turned back on we
can kill all the old and crufty non-uframe sched code.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
index 93380f7c32b4..7be35bcde713 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c
@@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ static void dwc2_set_stm32f4x9_fsotg_params(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg)
p->max_packet_count = 256;
p->phy_type = DWC2_PHY_TYPE_PARAM_FS;
p->i2c_enable = false;
- p->uframe_sched = false;
p->activate_stm_fs_transceiver = true;
}
--
2.18.0.345.g5c9ce644c3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists