linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: add a new helper dmam_async_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180726041038.GY3661@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:40:38 +0530
From:   Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Huang Shijie <sjhuang@...vatar.ai>
Cc:     corbet@....net, dan.j.williams@...el.com, robh@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: add a new helper dmam_async_device_register

On 26-07-18, 09:21, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ CLOCK
> > >     devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()
> > >   DMA
> > > +  dmam_async_device_register()
> > can we name it dmaengine_async_device_register, not to confuse with dma APIs
> ok.
> If no one objects the dmaengine_async_device_register().
> I will use it in the next version.

Relooking at it, we also need to suggest that it is devm api, so:

dmaenginem_async_device_register() would be better IMO

-- 
~Vinod