lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727012557.72fff5e1@xps13>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 01:25:57 +0200
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/memory/Kconfig: Add CONFIG_OF dependency

Hi Boris,

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote on Mon, 23 Jul 2018
11:41:07 +0200:

> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:34:43 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:  
> > > +Arnd, Rob and the DT ML.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:53:47 -0700
> > > Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >    
> > >> On 07/21/2018 01:00 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:    
> > >> > JZ4780_NEMC doesn't depend on OF, and if OF isn't enabled we get this
> > >> > error:
> > >> > drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c: In function ‘jz4780_nemc_num_banks’:
> > >> > drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c:72:10: error: implicit declaration of
> > >> >  function ‘of_read_number’; did you mean ‘down_read_nested’?
> > >> >  [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >> >    bank = of_read_number(prop, 1);
> > >> >           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >> >           down_read_nested    
> > >
> > > Looks like of.h defines stubs so that people can compile-test without
> > > CONFIG_OF selected. Maybe we should move of_read_number() and
> > > of_read_ulong() out of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF section.    
> > 
> > That seems fine, though the added dependency seems appropriate
> > here as well. of_read_number() is rarely used, and for the most part in
> > powerpc specific code that is guaranteed to have CONFIG_OF enabled,
> > so it's not that likely to cause many more problems.  
> 
> Ok, then I'll let Miquel apply Anders' patch to the NAND tree.

Applied to nand/next, thanks.

Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ