lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:41:03 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>
Cc:     "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        "open list:USER-MODE LINUX (UML)" 
        <user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 8/9] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
> Hardware support for faulting on the cpuid instruction is not required to
> emulate it, because cpuid triggers a VM exit anyways. KVM handles the relevant
> MSRs (MSR_PLATFORM_INFO and MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLE) and upon a
> cpuid-induced VM exit checks the cpuid faulting state and the CPL.
> kvm_require_cpl is even kind enough to inject the GP fault for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@...ehuey.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c            |  3 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h            | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c          |  7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a7066dc1a7e9..a0d6f0c47440 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -601,16 +601,18 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>         u64 pat;
>
>         unsigned switch_db_regs;
>         unsigned long db[KVM_NR_DB_REGS];
>         unsigned long dr6;
>         unsigned long dr7;
>         unsigned long eff_db[KVM_NR_DB_REGS];
>         unsigned long guest_debug_dr7;
> +       u64 msr_platform_info;
> +       u64 msr_misc_features_enables;
>
>         u64 mcg_cap;
>         u64 mcg_status;
>         u64 mcg_ctl;
>         u64 mcg_ext_ctl;
>         u64 *mce_banks;
>
>         /* Cache MMIO info */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index e85f6bd7b9d5..588ac8ae0a60 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -877,16 +877,19 @@ void kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx)
>         trace_kvm_cpuid(function, *eax, *ebx, *ecx, *edx);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_cpuid);
>
>  int kvm_emulate_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>         u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> +       if (cpuid_fault_enabled(vcpu) && !kvm_require_cpl(vcpu, 0))
> +               return;
> +
>         eax = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
>         ecx = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
>         kvm_cpuid(vcpu, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, eax);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX, ebx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX, ecx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX, edx);
>         return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> index 35058c2c0eea..a6fd40aade7c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h
> @@ -200,9 +200,20 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_stepping(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>         best = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, 0x1, 0);
>         if (!best)
>                 return -1;
>
>         return x86_stepping(best->eax);
>  }
>
> +static inline bool supports_cpuid_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +       return vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool cpuid_fault_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +       return vcpu->arch.msr_misc_features_enables &
> +                 MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT;
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index cedbba0f3402..8b4b5566c365 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -3848,16 +3848,23 @@ static int em_sti(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>         ctxt->interruptibility = KVM_X86_SHADOW_INT_STI;
>         ctxt->eflags |= X86_EFLAGS_IF;
>         return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>  }
>
>  static int em_cpuid(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  {
>         u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +       u64 msr = 0;
> +
> +       ctxt->ops->get_msr(ctxt, MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr);
> +       if (msr & MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT &&
> +           ctxt->ops->cpl(ctxt)) {
> +               return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0);
> +       }

Not strictly a comment on your patch, but why on Earth do there need
to be two copies of this check?

>
>         eax = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
>         ecx = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
>         ctxt->ops->get_cpuid(ctxt, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>         *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX) = eax;
>         *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBX) = ebx;
>         *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX) = ecx;
>         *reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RDX) = edx;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index e52c9088660f..1951b460da47 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -998,16 +998,18 @@ static u32 emulated_msrs[] = {
>
>         MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
>         MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
>         MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_EXT_CTL,
>         MSR_IA32_SMBASE,
> +       MSR_PLATFORM_INFO,
> +       MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES,
>  };
>
>  static unsigned num_emulated_msrs;
>
>  bool kvm_valid_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
>  {
>         if (efer & efer_reserved_bits)
>                 return false;
> @@ -2285,16 +2287,31 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>                         return 1;
>                 vcpu->arch.osvw.length = data;
>                 break;
>         case MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS:
>                 if (!guest_cpuid_has_osvw(vcpu))
>                         return 1;
>                 vcpu->arch.osvw.status = data;
>                 break;
> +       case MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
> +               if (!msr_info->host_initiated ||
> +                   data & ~MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT ||
> +                   (!(data & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT) &&
> +                    cpuid_fault_enabled(vcpu)))
> +                       return 1;
> +               vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = data;
> +               break;
> +       case MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES:
> +               if (data & ~MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT ||
> +                   (data & MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES_CPUID_FAULT &&
> +                    !supports_cpuid_fault(vcpu)))
> +                       return 1;
> +               vcpu->arch.msr_misc_features_enables = data;
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 if (msr && (msr == vcpu->kvm->arch.xen_hvm_config.msr))
>                         return xen_hvm_config(vcpu, data);
>                 if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr))
>                         return kvm_pmu_set_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
>                 if (!ignore_msrs) {
>                         vcpu_debug_ratelimited(vcpu, "unhandled wrmsr: 0x%x data 0x%llx\n",
>                                     msr, data);
> @@ -2499,16 +2516,22 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>                         return 1;
>                 msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.osvw.length;
>                 break;
>         case MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS:
>                 if (!guest_cpuid_has_osvw(vcpu))
>                         return 1;
>                 msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.osvw.status;
>                 break;
> +       case MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
> +               msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info;
> +               break;
> +       case MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES:
> +               msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_misc_features_enables;
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index))
>                         return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index, &msr_info->data);
>                 if (!ignore_msrs) {
>                         vcpu_debug_ratelimited(vcpu, "unhandled rdmsr: 0x%x\n",
>                                                msr_info->index);
>                         return 1;
>                 } else {
> @@ -7613,16 +7636,19 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>
>         kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
>         kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(vcpu);
>         vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
>
>         if (!init_event) {
>                 kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
>                 vcpu->arch.smbase = 0x30000;
> +
> +               vcpu->arch.msr_platform_info = MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> +               vcpu->arch.msr_misc_features_enables = 0;

Jim, I assume you're worried about this bit?  It seems like
msr_platform_info should maybe be initialized to zero to avoid causing
an unintended migration issue.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ