lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727143640.4dc3fa54@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 14:36:40 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the v4l-dvb tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-cpmem.c

between commit:

  343b23a7c6b6 ("media: gpu: ipu-v3: Allow negative offsets for interlaced scanning")

from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:

  4e3c5d7e05be ("gpu: ipu-v3: Allow negative offsets for interlaced scanning")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the drm tree version) and can carry the fix
as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but
any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ