linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily macroses on functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:29:52 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
Cc:     grygorii.strashko@...com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: replace unnecessarily
 macroses on functions

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 23:23 +0300, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> For ARM, situation a little bit different:
> $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 -DSWITCH foo.c
> $ size foo.o
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>      32	      0	      0	     32	     20	foo.o
[]
> $ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -c -O2 foo.c
> $ size foo.o
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>      28	      0	      0	     28	     1c	foo.o
[]
> So, it's shorter.

No worries.

I was kinda surprised the object code wasn't identical anyway.

cheers, Joe