[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B5B892D.1000305@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:05:49 -0500
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Varun Prakash <varun@...lsio.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/26] target/iscsi: Allocate session IDs from an IDA
On 07/27/2018 02:38 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:13:49PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> If we want to fix the bug first, then I made the attached patch and I
>> can submit it.
>
> How about I take it through my tree to minimise the amount of rebasing
> I'll need to do? I'm already dependent on the nvdimm tree and I'd rather
> not depend on the scsi tree as well. I'll queue it up in front of my
> IDA change to maximise its backportability.
Ccing Martin, because he has been handling target patches.
The above plan sounds ok to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists