[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0502MB3008C7EE53D450B68FB212E3D12A0@VI1PR0502MB3008.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 05:03:10 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-rdma-owner@...r.kernel.org>
> On Behalf Of Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:45 PM
> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Networking
> <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>; Linux-Next
> Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>; Ursula Braun
> <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>; Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>; linux-
> rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:28:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > I applied this merge fix patch:
>
> The final conflict resolution actually looks like this:
>
> (the rdma tree changes to net/smc/smc_core.c are dropped)
>
> c1d4bb2af93573ee4a21538a1a97b568a2344499
> diff --cc net/smc/smc_ib.c
> index 74f29f814ec1,2cc64bc8ae20..debc6e44f738
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ib.c
> @@@ -144,6 -142,93 +143,95 @@@ out
> return rc;
> }
>
> + static int smc_ib_fill_mac(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport)
> + {
> - struct ib_gid_attr gattr;
> - union ib_gid gid;
> - int rc;
> ++ const struct ib_gid_attr *gattr;
> ++ int rc = 0;
> +
> - rc = ib_query_gid(smcibdev->ibdev, ibport, 0, &gid, &gattr);
> - if (rc || !gattr.ndev)
> - return -ENODEV;
> ++ gattr = rdma_get_gid_attr(smcibdev->ibdev, ibport, 0);
> ++ if (IS_ERR(gattr))
> ++ return PTR_ERR(gattr);
> ++ if (!gattr->ndev) {
> ++ rc = -ENODEV;
> ++ goto done;
> ++ }
> +
> - memcpy(smcibdev->mac[ibport - 1], gattr.ndev->dev_addr, ETH_ALEN);
> - dev_put(gattr.ndev);
> - return 0;
> ++ memcpy(smcibdev->mac[ibport - 1], gattr->ndev->dev_addr,
> ETH_ALEN);
> ++done:
> ++ rdma_put_gid_attr(gattr);
> ++ return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* Create an identifier unique for this instance of SMC-R.
> + * The MAC-address of the first active registered IB device
> + * plus a random 2-byte number is used to create this identifier.
> + * This name is delivered to the peer during connection initialization.
> + */
> + static inline void smc_ib_define_local_systemid(struct smc_ib_device
> *smcibdev,
> + u8 ibport)
> + {
> + memcpy(&local_systemid[2], &smcibdev->mac[ibport - 1],
> + sizeof(smcibdev->mac[ibport - 1]));
> + get_random_bytes(&local_systemid[0], 2); }
> +
> + bool smc_ib_port_active(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport) {
> + return smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1].state == IB_PORT_ACTIVE; }
> +
> + /* determine the gid for an ib-device port and vlan id */ int
> + smc_ib_determine_gid(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev, u8 ibport,
> + unsigned short vlan_id, u8 gid[], u8 *sgid_index) {
> - struct ib_gid_attr gattr;
> - union ib_gid _gid;
> ++ const struct ib_gid_attr *gattr;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1].gid_tbl_len; i++) {
> - memset(&_gid, 0, SMC_GID_SIZE);
> - memset(&gattr, 0, sizeof(gattr));
> - if (ib_query_gid(smcibdev->ibdev, ibport, i, &_gid, &gattr))
> ++ gattr = rdma_get_gid_attr(smcibdev->ibdev, ibport, i);
> ++ if (IS_ERR(gattr))
> + continue;
> - if (!gattr.ndev)
> ++ if (!gattr->ndev)
> + continue;
Seeing this updated patch, so for completeness same reply as the previous email.
If (!gattr->ndev) {
rdma_put_gid_attr(gattr);
continue;
}
Rest changes above and below looks fine to me.
Thanks for doing it, I am not part of netdev mailing list so didn't see the compile error until this patch came up.
> - if (((!vlan_id && !is_vlan_dev(gattr.ndev)) ||
> - (vlan_id && is_vlan_dev(gattr.ndev) &&
> - vlan_dev_vlan_id(gattr.ndev) == vlan_id)) &&
> - gattr.gid_type == IB_GID_TYPE_IB) {
> ++ if (((!vlan_id && !is_vlan_dev(gattr->ndev)) ||
> ++ (vlan_id && is_vlan_dev(gattr->ndev) &&
> ++ vlan_dev_vlan_id(gattr->ndev) == vlan_id)) &&
> ++ gattr->gid_type == IB_GID_TYPE_IB) {
> + if (gid)
> - memcpy(gid, &_gid, SMC_GID_SIZE);
> ++ memcpy(gid, &gattr->gid, SMC_GID_SIZE);
> + if (sgid_index)
> + *sgid_index = i;
> - dev_put(gattr.ndev);
> ++ rdma_put_gid_attr(gattr);
> + return 0;
> + }
> - dev_put(gattr.ndev);
> ++ rdma_put_gid_attr(gattr);
> + }
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + static int smc_ib_remember_port_attr(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev,
> + u8 ibport) {
> + int rc;
> +
> + memset(&smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1], 0,
> + sizeof(smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1]));
> + rc = ib_query_port(smcibdev->ibdev, ibport,
> + &smcibdev->pattr[ibport - 1]);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> + /* the SMC protocol requires specification of the RoCE MAC address */
> + rc = smc_ib_fill_mac(smcibdev, ibport);
> + if (rc)
> + goto out;
> + if (!strncmp(local_systemid, SMC_LOCAL_SYSTEMID_RESET,
> + sizeof(local_systemid)) &&
> + smc_ib_port_active(smcibdev, ibport))
> + /* create unique system identifier */
> + smc_ib_define_local_systemid(smcibdev, ibport);
> + out:
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> /* process context wrapper for might_sleep smc_ib_remember_port_attr */
> static void smc_ib_port_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists