[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727152932.0ead76d1@lwn.net>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:29:32 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] docs/mm: make GFP flags descriptions usable as
 kernel-doc
On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:27:21 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I won't insist on this, but I would suggest that, in this particular case,
> > it might be better for that markup to come out.  
> 
> No problem with removing % signs, but the whitespace changes are necessary,
> otherwise the generated html gets weird.
The whitespace changes are fine - it's really just the % markup I was
commenting on.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
