[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h7elhupow.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:02:07 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: "Dae R. Jeong" <threeearcat@...il.com>
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kt0755@...il.com,
syzkaller@...glegroups.com, bammanag@...due.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup in snd_virmidi_output_trigger
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 07:51:04 +0200,
Dae R. Jeong wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 07:20:30AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> I think there is a mistake on the reported-by tag.
> The reported-by tag (e4c8abb920ef...) is for WARNING in port_delete.
> I guess the tag below is correct.
> Reported-by: syzbot+619d9f40141d826b097e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Could you please make sure that the reported-by tag is correct?
Indeed, corrected now. Thanks.
> By the way, I can't reproduce the crash WARNING in port_delete so
> far. I feel sad for saying this..
> I really want to reproduce the crash and thus, to help to fix the
> crash. If there is any progress on it, I will let you know
> immediately.
This looks like a sheer race condition.
Thanks for your help in anyway!
Takashi
>
> Best regards,
> Dae R. Jeong
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 06:13:22 +0200,
> > Dae R. Jeong wrote:
> > >
> > > I tested it and it worked.
> > > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > Good to hear. Below is the final patch with a proper comment (and
> > with syzbot reported-by, too) I'm going to queue to sound.git tree.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > -- 8< --
> >
> > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] ALSA: virmidi: Fix too long output trigger loop
> >
> > The virmidi output trigger tries to parse the all available bytes and
> > process sequencer events as much as possible. In a normal situation,
> > this is supposed to be relatively short, but a program may give a huge
> > buffer and it'll take a long time in a single spin lock, which may
> > eventually lead to a soft lockup.
> >
> > This patch simply adds a workaround, a cond_resched() call in the loop
> > if applicable. A better solution would be to move the event processor
> > into a work, but let's put a duct-tape quickly at first.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Dae R. Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+e4c8abb920efa77bace9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> > ---
> > sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > index 289ae6bb81d9..8ebbca554e99 100644
> > --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_virmidi.c
> > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ static void snd_virmidi_output_trigger(struct snd_rawmidi_substream *substream,
> > int count, res;
> > unsigned char buf[32], *pbuf;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + bool check_resched = !in_atomic();
> >
> > if (up) {
> > vmidi->trigger = 1;
> > @@ -200,6 +201,15 @@ static void snd_virmidi_output_trigger(struct snd_rawmidi_substream *substream,
> > vmidi->event.type = SNDRV_SEQ_EVENT_NONE;
> > }
> > }
> > + if (!check_resched)
> > + continue;
> > + /* do temporary unlock & cond_resched() for avoiding
> > + * CPU soft lockup, which may happen via a write from
> > + * a huge rawmidi buffer
> > + */
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > + cond_resched();
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > }
> > out:
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&substream->runtime->lock, flags);
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists