[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727074854.GA21840@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:48:54 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: include architecture Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig v3
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:32:19AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> This will just add a new unmet dependency warning.
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT will be still selected.
True. I guess we simply need to prohibit CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
explicitly if PREEMPT_COUNT isn't supported. E.g something like this:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 26d3ff7e3cf4..373ce9fecd7e 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ config DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
bool "Sleep inside atomic section checking"
select PREEMPT_COUNT
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+ depends on !ARCH_NO_PREEMPT
help
If you say Y here, various routines which may sleep will become very
noisy if they are called inside atomic sections: when a spinlock is
Powered by blists - more mailing lists