[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727082512.lpvmeuvxnw3mpeym@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:25:13 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/6] Resolve unwanted DMA backing with IOMMU
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 02:16:18AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The proposed solution adds a new option to the base device driver
> structure that allows device drivers to explicitly convey to the drivers
> core that the implicit IOMMU backing for devices must not happen.
Why is IOMMU mapping a problem for the Tegra GPU driver?
If we add something like this then it should not be the choice of the
device driver, but of the user and/or the firmware.
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists