[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180727083619.GA17942@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:36:19 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Michael Hanselmann <linux-kernel@...smi.ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the powerpc
tree
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 05:59:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> d69ccc00c497 ("MAINTAINERS: Remove the entry for the orphaned ams driver")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
> 28d1a7ac2a0d ("iio: dac: Add AD5758 support")
>
> from the staging tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks good to me, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists