[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201807271704468308230@163.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 17:04:48 +0800
From: "liujunliang_ljl@....com" <liujunliang_ljl@....com>
To: "Jia-Ju Bai" <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Cc: linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jia-Ju Bai" <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: usb: sr9700: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in sr9700_bind()
Dear Jia-Ju Bai :
OK.
the patch is ok.
liujunliang_ljl@....com
From: Jia-Ju Bai
Date: 2018-07-27 16:41
To: liujunliang_ljl
CC: linux-usb; netdev; linux-kernel; Jia-Ju Bai
Subject: [PATCH] net: usb: sr9700: Replace mdelay() with msleep() in sr9700_bind()
sr9700_bind() is never called in atomic context.
It calls mdelay() to busily wait, which is not necessary.
mdelay() can be replaced with msleep().
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c b/drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c
index 2d316c1b851b..6ac232e52bf7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/sr9700.c
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int sr9700_bind(struct usbnet *dev, struct usb_interface *intf)
/* power up and reset phy */
sr_write_reg(dev, SR_PRR, PRR_PHY_RST);
/* at least 10ms, here 20ms for safe */
- mdelay(20);
+ msleep(20);
sr_write_reg(dev, SR_PRR, 0);
/* at least 1ms, here 2ms for reading right register */
udelay(2 * 1000);
--
2.17.0
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists