linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.17 44/66] tcp: detect malicious patterns in tcp_collapse_ofo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180727093814.040292244@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:45:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 44/66] tcp: detect malicious patterns in tcp_collapse_ofo_queue()

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 3d4bf93ac12003f9b8e1e2de37fe27983deebdcf ]

In case an attacker feeds tiny packets completely out of order,
tcp_collapse_ofo_queue() might scan the whole rb-tree, performing
expensive copies, but not changing socket memory usage at all.

1) Do not attempt to collapse tiny skbs.
2) Add logic to exit early when too many tiny skbs are detected.

We prefer not doing aggressive collapsing (which copies packets)
for pathological flows, and revert to tcp_prune_ofo_queue() which
will be less expensive.

In the future, we might add the possibility of terminating flows
that are proven to be malicious.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -4834,6 +4834,7 @@ end:
 static void tcp_collapse_ofo_queue(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+	u32 range_truesize, sum_tiny = 0;
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *head;
 	u32 start, end;
 
@@ -4845,6 +4846,7 @@ new_range:
 	}
 	start = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
 	end = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
+	range_truesize = skb->truesize;
 
 	for (head = skb;;) {
 		skb = skb_rb_next(skb);
@@ -4855,11 +4857,20 @@ new_range:
 		if (!skb ||
 		    after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, end) ||
 		    before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, start)) {
-			tcp_collapse(sk, NULL, &tp->out_of_order_queue,
-				     head, skb, start, end);
+			/* Do not attempt collapsing tiny skbs */
+			if (range_truesize != head->truesize ||
+			    end - start >= SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(SK_MEM_QUANTUM)) {
+				tcp_collapse(sk, NULL, &tp->out_of_order_queue,
+					     head, skb, start, end);
+			} else {
+				sum_tiny += range_truesize;
+				if (sum_tiny > sk->sk_rcvbuf >> 3)
+					return;
+			}
 			goto new_range;
 		}
 
+		range_truesize += skb->truesize;
 		if (unlikely(before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, start)))
 			start = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
 		if (after(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq, end))