[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180727173259.htdxpn4i2fxprpaj@p50.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:32:59 -0500
From: John Allen <jallen@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
mgorman@...e.de, nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Infinite looping observed in __offline_pages
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03:36PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Wed 25-07-18 13:11:15, John Allen wrote:
>[...]
>> Does a failure in do_migrate_range indicate that the range is unmigratable
>> and the loop in __offline_pages should terminate and goto failed_removal? Or
>> should we allow a certain number of retrys before we
>> give up on migrating the range?
>
>Unfortunatelly not. Migration code doesn't tell a difference between
>ephemeral and permanent failures. We are relying on
>start_isolate_page_range to tell us this. So the question is, what kind
>of page is not migratable and for what reason.
>
>Are you able to add some debugging to give us more information. The
>current debugging code in the hotplug/migration sucks...
After reproducing the problem a couple times, it seems that it can occur
for different types of pages. Running page-types on the offending page
over two separate instances produced the following:
# tools/vm/page-types -a 307968-308224
flags page-count MB symbolic-flags long-symbolic-flags
0x0000000000000400 1 0 __________B________________________________ buddy
total 1 0
And the following on a separate run:
# tools/vm/page-types -a 313088-313344
flags page-count MB symbolic-flags long-symbolic-flags
0x000000000000006c 1 0 __RU_lA____________________________________ referenced,uptodate,lru,active
total 1 0
The source of the failure in migrate_pages actually doesn't seem to be
that we're hitting the case of the permanent failure, but instead the
-EAGAIN case. I traced the EAGAIN return back to
migrate_page_move_mapping which I've seen return EAGAIN in two places:
mm/migrate.c:453
if (!mapping) {
/* Anonymous page without mapping */
if (page_count(page) != expected_count)
return -EAGAIN;
mm/migrate.c:476
if (page_count(page) != expected_count ||
radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(pslot,
&mapping->i_pages.xa_lock) != page) {
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
return -EAGAIN;
}
So it seems in each case, the actual reference count for the page is not
what it is expected to be.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists