lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CF6A88132359CE47947DB4C6E1709ED53BB4FB62@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Jul 2018 00:02:38 +0000
From:   "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
To:     "Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] ACPI fix for v4.18-rc7



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Schmauss, Erik
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 2:51 PM
> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] ACPI fix for v4.18-rc7
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-acpi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> > owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
> > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 11:38 AM
> > To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > <linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> > Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ACPI fix for v4.18-rc7
> >
> > My XPS13 laptop is unhappy with something recent.
> >
> > As of yesterday, I get this at bootup:
> >
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Linux-Dell-Video)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI Error: Result stack is empty! State=(____ptrval____)
> > (20180531/dswstate-65)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, Missing or null operand
> > (20180531/dsutils-612)
> >   ACPI Error: AE_AML_NO_RETURN_VALUE, While creating Arg 0
> > (20180531/dsutils-727)
> >   ACPI: 9 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
> >
> > It does *not* happen in
> >
> >     Linux version 4.18.0-rc6-00110-g6e77b267723c
> >
> > but it *does* happen in
> >
> >     Linux version 4.18.0-rc6-00152-gcd3f77d74ac3
> >
> > and while I didn't bisect it, I'm assuming it's due to 73c2a01c52b6
> > ("ACPICA: AML Parser: ignore dispatcher error status during table
> > load")
> >
> > Ideas?
> 
> Sorry about the breakage. I found the cause this failure and I'm working on a fix
> right now.
> 
> Erik

Hi,

The patch below should be able to fix this.


From a828a091828599154d8f6e8bfee1495a3df5cf34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:37:35 -0700
From: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1] ACPICA: AML Parser: ignore control method status in module-level code

Previous change in the AML parser code blindly set all non-successful
dispatcher statuses to AE_OK. This approach is incorrect because
successful control method invocations from module-level return
AE_CTRL_TRANSFER. Overwriting AE_OK to this status causes the AML
parser to think that there was no return value from the control
method invocation.

fixes: 73c2a01c52b6 (ACPICA: AML Parser: ignore dispatcher error status during table load)

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
---
 psloop.c |   19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -Nurp linux.before_name/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c linux.after_name/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c
--- linux.before_name/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c	2018-07-27 15:53:31.073522915 -0700
+++ linux.after_name/drivers/acpi/acpica/psloop.c	2018-07-27 15:53:25.320522527 -0700
@@ -714,15 +714,20 @@ acpi_status acpi_ps_parse_loop(struct ac
 			} else
 			    if ((walk_state->
 				 parse_flags & ACPI_PARSE_MODULE_LEVEL)
+				&& status != AE_CTRL_TRANSFER
 				&& ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 				/*
-				 * ACPI_PARSE_MODULE_LEVEL means that we are loading a table by
-				 * executing it as a control method. However, if we encounter
-				 * an error while loading the table, we need to keep trying to
-				 * load the table rather than aborting the table load. Set the
-				 * status to AE_OK to proceed with the table load. If we get a
-				 * failure at this point, it means that the dispatcher got an
-				 * error while processing Op (most likely an AML operand error.
+				 * ACPI_PARSE_MODULE_LEVEL flag means that we are currently
+				 * loading a table by executing it as a control method.
+				 * However, if we encounter an error while loading the table,
+				 * we need to keep trying to load the table rather than
+				 * aborting the table load (setting the status to AE_OK
+				 * continues the table load). If we get a failure at this
+				 * point, it means that the dispatcher got an error while
+				 * processing Op (most likely an AML operand error) or a
+				 * control method was called from module level and the
+				 * dispatcher returned AE_CTRL_TRANSFER. In the latter case,
+				 * leave the status alone, there's nothing wrong with it.
 				 */
 				status = AE_OK;
 			}


> 
> >
> > Note only the errors are new. On older kernels, I just get:
> >
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
> >   ACPI: Added _OSI(Linux-Dell-Video)
> >   ACPI: 9 ACPI AML tables successfully acquired and loaded
> >
> > without the big slew of errors.
> >
> >           Linus
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo
> > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> .  칻. & ~ & .  +-  ݶ.  w  ˛   m b  Zr    ^n r   z .  h    &  . G   h .( 階 ݢj"  . .m     z ޖ   f
> h   ~ m

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ