[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180729220453.13431-13-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 23:04:50 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/16] btrfs: lift make_bad_inode() into btrfs_iget()
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
we don't need to check is_bad_inode() after the call of
btrfs_read_locked_inode() - it's exactly the same as checking
return value for being non-zero.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 9382e0881900..8f0b2592feb0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3777,7 +3777,6 @@ static int btrfs_read_locked_inode(struct inode *inode)
make_bad:
btrfs_free_path(path);
- make_bad_inode(inode);
return ret;
}
@@ -5708,12 +5707,13 @@ struct inode *btrfs_iget(struct super_block *s, struct btrfs_key *location,
int ret;
ret = btrfs_read_locked_inode(inode);
- if (!is_bad_inode(inode)) {
+ if (!ret) {
inode_tree_add(inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
if (new)
*new = 1;
} else {
+ make_bad_inode(inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
iput(inode);
ASSERT(ret < 0);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists