[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34cf62f3-3acc-0ef7-6c5b-906df2b75b29@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:15:28 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] btrfs: lift make_bad_inode() into btrfs_iget()
On 30.07.2018 01:04, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> we don't need to check is_bad_inode() after the call of
> btrfs_read_locked_inode() - it's exactly the same as checking
> return value for being non-zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 9382e0881900..8f0b2592feb0 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -3777,7 +3777,6 @@ static int btrfs_read_locked_inode(struct inode *inode)
>
> make_bad:
> btrfs_free_path(path);
> - make_bad_inode(inode);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -5708,12 +5707,13 @@ struct inode *btrfs_iget(struct super_block *s, struct btrfs_key *location,
> int ret;
>
> ret = btrfs_read_locked_inode(inode);
> - if (!is_bad_inode(inode)) {
> + if (!ret) {
> inode_tree_add(inode);
> unlock_new_inode(inode);
> if (new)
> *new = 1;
> } else {
> + make_bad_inode(inode);
> unlock_new_inode(inode);
> iput(inode);
> ASSERT(ret < 0);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists