linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mm: inititalize struct pages when adding a section

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:53:06 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...hadventures.net>,
        YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm: inititalize struct pages when adding a section

On 30.07.2018 13:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 27-07-18 18:54:54, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Right now, struct pages are inititalized when memory is onlined, not
>> when it is added (since commit d0dc12e86b31 ("mm/memory_hotplug: optimize
>> memory hotplug")).
>>
>> remove_memory() will call arch_remove_memory(). Here, we usually access
>> the struct page to get the zone of the pages.
>>
>> So effectively, we access stale struct pages in case we remove memory that
>> was never onlined. So let's simply inititalize them earlier, when the
>> memory is added. We only have to take care of updating the zone once we
>> know it. We can use a dummy zone for that purpose.
> 
> I have considered something like this when I was reworking memory
> hotplug to not associate struct pages with zone before onlining and I
> considered this to be rather fragile. I would really not like to get
> back to that again if possible.
> 
>> So effectively, all pages will already be initialized and set to
>> reserved after memory was added but before it was onlined (and even the
>> memblock is added). We only inititalize pages once, to not degrade
>> performance.
> 
> To be honest, I would rather see d0dc12e86b31 reverted. It is late in
> the release cycle and if the patch is buggy then it should be reverted
> rather than worked around. I found the optimization not really
> convincing back then and this is still the case TBH.
> 

If I am not wrong, that's already broken in 4.17, no? What about that?

If we don't care about that, then I agree to reverting said commit for
v4.18.

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb