linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/traps: Use REG_FMT in show_signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:28:38 -0300
From:   Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, "Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>,
        Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
        "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@...ilva.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] powerpc/traps: Use REG_FMT in show_signal_msg()

Hi, Christophe.

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 06:40:23PM +0200, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com> a écrit :
>
> > Simplify the message format by using REG_FMT as the register format.  This
> > avoids having two different formats and avoids checking for MSR_64BIT.
>
> Are you sure it is what we want ?

Yes.

> Won't it change the behaviour for a 32 bits app running on a 64bits kernel ?

In fact, this changes how many zeroes are prefixed when displaying the registers
(%016lx vs. %08lx format).  For example, 32-bits userspace, 64-bits kernel:

before this series:
  [66475.002900] segv[4599]: unhandled signal 11 at 00000000 nip 10000420 lr 0fe61854 code 1

after this series:
  [   73.414535] segv[3759]: segfault (11) at 0000000000000000 nip 0000000010000420 lr 000000000fe61854 code 1 in segv[10000000+10000]
  [   73.414641] segv[3759]: code: 4e800421 80010014 38210010 7c0803a6 4bffff30 9421ffd0 93e1002c 7c3f0b78
  [   73.414665] segv[3759]: code: 39200000 913f001c 813f001c 39400001 <91490000> 39200000 7d234b78 397f0030

Have you spotted any other behaviour change?

Cheers
Murilo