[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180730184337.GA19888@xux707-tw>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 19:43:38 +0100
From: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] staging:rtl8192u: Remove typedef of struct
cmpk_txfb_t - Style
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:11:38AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:07:33PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> > Remove the typedef of the structure cmpk_txfb_t. This clears the
> > checkpatch issue with defining new types.
> >
> > Additionally the type is renamed from cmpk_txfb_t to cmd_pkt_tx_feedback
> > removing the '_t' as the typedef has been removed.
> >
> > These changes are purely coding style in nature and should have no
> > impact on runtime code execution.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c | 8 ++++----
> > drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.h | 6 +++---
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> > index 3140b3413f91..630cf612f265 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
> > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ rt_status SendTxCommandPacket(struct net_device *dev, void *pData, u32 DataLen)
> > * Overview:
> > *
> > * Input: PADAPTER pAdapter
> > - * CMPK_TXFB_T *psTx_FB
> > + * STRUCT CMD_PKT_TX_FEEDBACK *psTx_FB
>
> nit, this should all be in lowercase now right?
>
> Anyway, these function comments need to all go anyway, they are horrid :)
>
> Something for future patches, look at the ones for the gasket driver
> sent yesterday as an example of what to do.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Thanks for the pointer to gasket driver. I didn't like to start into horrid
comments, thinking that maybe they do convey some information to somebody, or
they're in that format for a reson. The code is easier. Anyhow thanks for
that pointer, and I will change comments in future. Sure all that can
happen is you'll reject some/all, but sure I might learn the style required.
jwhitmore
Powered by blists - more mailing lists