[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180731224706.GO45322@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:47:06 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/AER: Enable SERR# forwarding in non ACPI flow
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:15:19PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Currently PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR is being enabled only in
> ACPI flow.
> This bit is required for forwarding errors reported
> by EP devices to upstream device.
> This patch enables SERR# for Type-1 PCI device.
This does seem broken.
Figure 6-3 in PCIe r4.0, sec 6.2.6, would be a helpful reference to
include in the commit log.
Semi-related question: there are about 40 drivers that call
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() and
pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(). I see that the PCI core
calls pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() for Root Ports and Switch
Ports in this path:
aer_probe # for root ports only
aer_enable_rootport
set_downstream_devices_error_reporting
set_device_error_reporting
if (ROOT_PORT || UPSTREAM || DOWNSTREAM)
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting
pci_walk_bus(..., set_device_error_reporting)
But the core doesn't call pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() for
endpoints. I wonder why not. Could we? And then remove the calls
from those drivers? If PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS should only be set if the
driver is prepared, the pci_driver.err_handler would be a good hint.
But I suspect we could do something sensible and at least report
errors even if the driver doesn't have err_handler callbacks.
On MIPS Octeon, it looks like pcibios_plat_dev_init() does already set
PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS for every device.
But this question is obviously far beyond the scope of this current
patch.
> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index a2e8838..943e084 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -343,6 +343,19 @@ int pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (!dev->aer_cap)
> return -EIO;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) &&
> + dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
I think this test needs to be refined a little bit. If the kernel
happens to be built with CONFIG_ACPI=y but the current platform
doesn't support ACPI, we still want to set PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR,
don't we?
> + u16 control;
> +
> + /*
> + * A Type-1 PCI bridge will not forward ERR_ messages coming
> + * from an endpoint if SERR# forwarding is not enabled.
> + */
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
> + control |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
> + }
> +
> return pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting);
> @@ -352,6 +365,16 @@ int pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev)
> if (pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(dev))
> return -EIO;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) &&
> + dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> + u16 control;
> +
> + /* Clear SERR Forwarding */
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &control);
> + control &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_SERR;
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, control);
> + }
> +
> return pcie_capability_clear_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL,
> PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS);
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists