linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:34:03 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using
 the reset framework

On Mon 02 Jul 05:08 PDT 2018, Sekhar Nori wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
> >> Hi Bartosz,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >>>
> >>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
> >>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
> >>> framework.
> >>>
> >>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
> >>> merged.
> >>
> >> Series looks good to me.
> >>
> >> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
> >> and #2 ?
> >>
> >> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
> >> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
> >>
> >> Open to other suggestions as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sekhar
> > 
> > Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?
> 
> With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit
> to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you
> want to queue from your tree.
> 

I'm not sure why I didn't see your request earlier, sorry about that.

I seem to have one other davinci patch from Suman, which should be
possible to merge without any conflicts. So there's no need for an
immutable branch at this time.

Regards,
Bjorn