| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 15:04:41 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
Billows Wu <billows.wu@...eadtrum.com>,
Jason Wu <jason.wu@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/7] mmc: sdhci: add Auto CMD Auto Select support
Hi Adrian,
On 30 July 2018 at 21:06, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> On 23/07/18 13:08, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
>> As SD Host Controller Specification v4.10 documents:
>> Host Controller Version 4.10 defines this "Auto CMD Auto Select" mode.
>> Selection of Auto CMD depends on setting of CMD23 Enable in the Host
>> Control 2 register which indicates whether card supports CMD23. If CMD23
>> Enable =1, Auto CMD23 is used and if CMD23 Enable =0, Auto CMD12 is
>> used. In case of Version 4.10 or later, use of Auto CMD Auto Select is
>> recommended rather than use of Auto CMD12 Enable or Auto CMD23
>> Enable.
>>
>> This patch add this new mode support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 5acea3d..5c60590 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,23 @@ static void sdhci_config_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> sdhci_writeb(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
>> }
>>
>> +static void sdhci_enable_cmd23(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> +{
>> + u16 ctrl2;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This is used along with "Auto CMD Auto Select" feature,
>> + * which is introduced from v4.10, if card supports CMD23,
>> + * Auto CMD23 should be used instead of Auto CMD12.
>> + */
>> + if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_410 &&
>> + (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_CMD23)) {
>
> That is the host capability. It needs to be the card capability.
Could you please elaborate the issue?
I thought we're setting for host here. Do you mean we need to see the
card capability?
>
>> + ctrl2 = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> + ctrl2 |= SDHCI_CMD23_ENABLE;
>> + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl2, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void sdhci_init(struct sdhci_host *host, int soft)
>> {
>> struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc;
>> @@ -329,6 +346,8 @@ static void sdhci_init(struct sdhci_host *host, int soft)
>> host->clock = 0;
>> mmc->ops->set_ios(mmc, &mmc->ios);
>> }
>> +
>> + sdhci_enable_cmd23(host);
>> }
>>
>> static void sdhci_reinit(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> @@ -1093,6 +1112,36 @@ static inline bool sdhci_auto_cmd12(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> !mrq->cap_cmd_during_tfr;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline void sdhci_auto_cmd_select(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> + struct mmc_command *cmd,
>> + u16 *mode)
>> +{
>> + bool use_cmd12 = sdhci_auto_cmd12(host, cmd->mrq) &&
>> + (cmd->opcode != SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED);
>> + bool use_cmd23 = cmd->mrq->sbc && (host->flags & SDHCI_AUTO_CMD23);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In case of Version 4.10 or later, use of 'Auto CMD Auto
>> + * Select' is recommended rather than use of 'Auto CMD12
>> + * Enable' or 'Auto CMD23 Enable'.
>> + */
>> + if (host->version >= SDHCI_SPEC_410 && (use_cmd12 || use_cmd23)) {
>> + *mode |= SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_SEL;
>
> As noted in patch 4, the CMD23 argument is not just the block count for eMMC.
Probably I haven't got your point...
>From what I understand, auto_sel mode doesn't need argument2. Doesn't
this work for eMMC?
The test platform I used was just eMMC only, haven't found problem.
Thanks,
Chunyan
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If we are sending CMD23, CMD12 never gets sent
>> + * on successful completion (so no Auto-CMD12).
>> + */
>> + if (use_cmd12) {
>> + *mode |= SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD12;
>> + } else if (use_cmd23) {
>> + *mode |= SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD23;
>> + sdhci_writel(host, cmd->mrq->sbc->arg, SDHCI_ARGUMENT2);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static void sdhci_set_transfer_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> struct mmc_command *cmd)
>> {
>> @@ -1119,17 +1168,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_transfer_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
>>
>> if (mmc_op_multi(cmd->opcode) || data->blocks > 1) {
>> mode = SDHCI_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN | SDHCI_TRNS_MULTI;
>> - /*
>> - * If we are sending CMD23, CMD12 never gets sent
>> - * on successful completion (so no Auto-CMD12).
>> - */
>> - if (sdhci_auto_cmd12(host, cmd->mrq) &&
>> - (cmd->opcode != SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED))
>> - mode |= SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD12;
>> - else if (cmd->mrq->sbc && (host->flags & SDHCI_AUTO_CMD23)) {
>> - mode |= SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD23;
>> - sdhci_writel(host, cmd->mrq->sbc->arg, SDHCI_ARGUMENT2);
>> - }
>> + sdhci_auto_cmd_select(host, cmd, &mode);
>> }
>>
>> if (data->flags & MMC_DATA_READ)
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
>> index 81aae07..a8f4ec2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #define SDHCI_TRNS_BLK_CNT_EN 0x02
>> #define SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD12 0x04
>> #define SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_CMD23 0x08
>> +#define SDHCI_TRNS_AUTO_SEL 0x0C
>> #define SDHCI_TRNS_READ 0x10
>> #define SDHCI_TRNS_MULTI 0x20
>>
>> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_DRV_TYPE_D 0x0030
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING 0x0040
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK 0x0080
>> +#define SDHCI_CMD23_ENABLE 0x0800
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_V4_MODE 0x1000
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_64BIT_ADDR 0x2000
>> #define SDHCI_CTRL_PRESET_VAL_ENABLE 0x8000
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists