[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180731080337.nomq6pwophsvib4s@techsingularity.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:03:37 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eero.t.tamminen@...el.com, ggherdovich@...e.cz,
currojerez@...eup.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Limit the scope of HWP dynamic
boost platforms
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:00:29PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Dynamic boosting of HWP performance on IO wake showed significant
> improvement to IO workloads. This series was intended for Skylake Xeon
> platforms only and feature was enabled by default based on CPU model
> number.
>
> But some Xeon platforms reused the Skylake desktop CPU model number. This
> caused some undesirable side effects to some graphics workloads. Since
> they are heavily IO bound, the increase in CPU performance decreased the
> power available for GPU to do its computing and hence decrease in graphics
> benchmark performance.
>
> For example on a Skylake desktop, GpuTest benchmark showed average FPS
> reduction from 529 to 506.
>
> This change makes sure that HWP boost feature is only enabled for Skylake
> server platforms by using ACPI FADT preferred PM Profile. If some desktop
> users wants to get benefit of boost, they can still enable boost from
> intel_pstate sysfs attribute "hwp_dynamic_boost".
>
> Fixes: 41ab43c9c89e (cpufreq: intel_pstate: enable boost for Skylake Xeon)
> Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107410
> Reported-by: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists